« Climate impacts already hitting hard in many areas | Main | Hidden Costs and Consequences - Fukushima »

Tuesday, August 27, 2013


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Fairfax Climate Watch

There's a book that could (or should?) be written on excluded feedbacks in the climate models.


You Can Find Videos & Movies Here!
- http://climatestate.com/magazine/

People say, "It's complicated", when they know it is bad.
we hope when there is bad news, the worse the news, the more we hope. this is why you are so hopeful. yes slavery was abolished, communism fell apart, civil rights blossomed, Nelson Mandela was freed. but what, hasn't changed? it's war. war has not changed. war has been the constant loyal friend throughout all history. look what 1°C has already wrought. mix in war and 2°C and the conclusion is inevitable. you know this.

The acidity of the oceans will more than double in the next 40 years. This rate is 10 times faster than 55 million years ago when when a mass extinction of marine life occurred. It is also faster than during 4 of earth's biggest mass extinction events during the last 300 hundred million years -- faster than even the great Permian mass extinction event where 95% of life on earth vanished 250 million years ago. The oceans are now 30% more acidic than in pre-industrial times. In less than 40 years they will be 60% more acidic than then. They may well be 4 times as acidic by the end of this century. Talk about hairline fractures.

When ice ages come and go the planet can change temperature 5°C in as little as 5,000 years. 50 times slower than what we are doing to earth now. In the past, a 5°C change normally takes 20,000 years, we are going to do 5°C in 50-100 years, 200 times faster.

Climate change is happening 100 times faster than in the past.

By 2025, humans will impact 50% of earth's biosphere. This will cause a planetary ecological state shift leading to a mass extinction event that is unstoppable and irreversible once started.

Why does nobody talk about the thousands of 1-kilometer wide bubbling methane seabeds recorded in 2011.

Only 1% of methane needs to be released to cause total disaster.
Peter Wadhams interview

Natalia Shakhova interview:
do you believe scientists
who spent 30 years in the arctic
or do you believe scientists
who spent 30 years at their computer?

you look for Disqus > Shizel > voodroom.weebly

Fairfax Climate Watch

Thanks for the video links - I'm already enjoying the first one I happened to click on: "Crude - the incredible Journey of Oil." Also check out the video collection on this site too,

Fairfax Climate Watch

that "crude" video is here btw: http://youtu.be/cPgfnwi2m9M

Fairfax Climate Watch

Check out the newly updated methane and "δ13C in CH₄" graphs in the War Room:

If isotope Carbon 13 values in methane (δ13C in CH₄) change from previous seasonal patterns, that is an indicator of a new source of methane.

If δ13C in CH₄ falls sharply, it could indicate methane hydrate release in that area.

Local variations give some clue as to the point sources. Some places are more insulated from seasonal fluctuations and point sources than others.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Convert carbon dioxide (CO2) weight to carbon (C) weight


CO2/3.67 = C 


ex: 40 GtCO2 ≈ 10.9 GtC


1 Gt (Gigatonne) = 1 billion tonnes

1 tonne = 1,000 kg


Also: 1 Pg = 1 Gt


1 Pg (Petagram) = 1 quadrillion grams


Soil specialists tend to use Pg, as they are used to working with gram units per square meter of soil area. Atmospheric specialists tend to use Gt. 

Convert carbon emissions to ppm atmospheric CO2


GtC/2.12 = ppm

To convert emissions of carbon to atmospheric ppm CO2, carbon sinks must be taken into account. 

So far, terrestrial and oceanic sinks have taken up about 50% of CO2.



ex: 40 GtCO2 emissions ≈ 10.9 GtC

10.9 GtC/2.12 ≈ 5.14 ppm CO2 before accounting for sinks

5.14 ppm CO2 x 0.5 ≈ 2.57 ppm CO2 after accounting for sinks


Faith Alliance for Climate Solutions

Highlighted Research